Editorial
Unveiling the Path to Success: The Enduring Relevance of Scientific Journals
Main Article Content
Fernando Pimentel dos Santos
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Lawrence PA. The politics of publication. Nature. 2003;422:259-61. doi: 10.1038/422259a. PMID: 12646895.
Ware M, Mabe M. The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers 2015.[accessed May 2023]
Available from: https://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf
Galipeau J, Barbour V, Baskin P, Bell-Syer S, Cobey K, Cumpston M, et al. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals. BMC Med. 2016;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0561-2.
Horbach SP, Halffman W. The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications. Scientometrics. 2019;118:339-73. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2969-2.
Mulligan A, Hall L, Raphael E. Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013; 64: 132-61.
Glonti K, Boutron I, Moher D, Hren D. Journal editors' perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e035600. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035600.
Bornmann L. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013; 64: 217-33.
Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DV, Button KS, Chambers CD, du Sert NP, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
